Dreaming Trees: How Artists and Poets Found Muse Among Branches

It begins with the rustle of leaves. Not loud, not hurried – just the kind of sound that hushes everything else. A breeze moves through the branches like breath, and the whole world seems to slow. For centuries, trees have not only shaded the earth but shaded thoughts too, pulling dreamers into their stillness, coaxing artists and poets into quiet reverie. There is something about a tree that asks nothing and gives everything simply by existing. By growing. By staying.

Painters have followed the twist of branches like lines on a page, finding rhythm in their chaos. Van Gogh, for instance, was captivated by cypress trees in the Provençal landscape. He didn’t treat them as scenery, but as subjects full of feeling. In his paintings, they rise and wriggle like flames – alive, unsettled, bursting with energy. To Van Gogh, trees were not just part of the backdrop; they were emotion made visible. He often wrote about them in his letters more than he painted them. “They speak to me,” he once said. Not literally, of course, but in the way trees communicate – through leaning, swaying, and the slow spiraling of limbs toward light. In their posture, in their patience, he saw something worth listening to.

Poets, too, have long turned to trees when words grew distant. William Wordsworth may have wandered lonely as a cloud, but more often, he wandered through woods. Leaves underfoot, lichen on stone, birdsong overhead – these were not distractions, but invitations. He called nature “the anchor of my purest thoughts.” To write clearly, he needed to listen first. Not to the noise of people or politics, but to the quieter sounds of the natural world. That habit hasn’t disappeared with time. Many modern poets still admit their best lines arrive not at desks, but on walks under trees, where the branches arch like cathedral ceilings and silence feels generous instead of empty.

A tree invites pause. It doesn’t rush. It doesn’t scroll or buzz. It simply stands, and in doing so, it models a slower kind of noticing. Georgia O’Keeffe once said she could spend hours just watching the shape of a single branch. Her tree paintings aren’t romanticized or idealized. They are direct, spare, and reverent. She painted the skeleton of trees with as much intimacy as her famous flowers, not for their beauty alone, but for their sheer presence. To her, a bare tree wasn’t empty – it was honest. And that honesty gave it power.

Some artists spend days under the same tree, sketching from different angles, waiting for the light to shift. Others return to a single grove over years, watching how it changes and how it stays the same. They speak of something shifting in them, too – a kind of returning. A remembering. In those quiet sessions, creativity doesn’t come like a lightning bolt. It comes like sap. Slow. Steady. Alive.

Even those who never roamed wild forests found ways to bring trees into their art. Emily Dickinson, often confined to her home, filled her poems with beeches, birches, and imagined woodlands. For her, trees were more than symbols. They were companions. Witnesses. Keepers of things unsaid. In her verses, trees held secrets and meanings that society wasn’t yet ready to hear. They stood silently in the margins of her life – much like she did – yet carried tremendous weight. Trees, for Dickinson, weren’t just decorative. They were essential.

There’s something beautifully stubborn about trees. They continue growing even after losing limbs. They bend without breaking. They endure seasons, droughts, storms. In their scars, they store memory. In their rings, they keep time. Artists, often bruised or bewildered by the world, look to trees as proof that survival can still be beautiful. That growing older doesn’t mean fading. That brokenness isn’t the end of the story.

In Japanese haiku, the cherry blossom represents more than springtime. It holds within its bloom the ache of impermanence – beauty and sorrow in the same breath. The poet Bashō wrote often about trees, especially in the fleeting moments when blossoms fell like snow. His verses, so short yet heavy with emotion, showed how trees could capture the whole of life in just a few lines. In haiku, trees are not just part of the setting. They are the story. They mark beginnings, endings, and everything in between. They are clocks and calendars. They are ancestors.

Leonardo da Vinci didn’t paint trees just because they were pretty. He studied them. He observed how branches split and curved, how the flow of sap resembled the flow of blood. To him, a tree was a map of the body, of nature, of the universe. That idea – that trees reflect us – has echoed through centuries of art. We see ourselves in trees. Their roots mirror our past. Their leaves, our thoughts. Their reach, our hopes.

This belief shows up everywhere, if you look closely. In Gustav Klimt’s swirling Tree of Life, golden spirals twist like tangled dreams. In Joni Mitchell’s lyrics, when she laments, “They paved paradise,” the absence of trees becomes a kind of grief. In Maya Angelou’s voice, trees are not passive – they speak. “A tree called life began to talk to me,” she wrote, inviting us to hear what we too often ignore.

Even today, artists and writers continue to dream under trees. In children’s books, trees become magical guardians. In galleries, installations feature fallen branches or sculptures made from driftwood. Some creatives use leaves as paintbrushes. Others carve verses into stumps or let moss grow over their canvases. Trees remain relevant not just because they are beautiful, but because they are generous. They offer space. They offer perspective. And most importantly, they offer stillness.

Walk into any forest, and you’ll feel it. That hush. That breathless quiet where even your own footsteps feel loud. It’s not your imagination – or maybe it is, but the good kind. The kind that wakes up. The kind that lingers. That nudges you to notice what you usually don’t. The kind that artists and poets have always followed.

Some say creativity grows best in stillness. If that’s true, then a tree is the perfect companion. It does not demand. It does not distract. It simply stands, offering its quiet shade to anyone willing to slow down. Beneath a tree, time feels different. It stretches out, like roots into soil, until you start to notice things again. The curve of light. The scent of bark. The soft conversation of leaves in wind.

Many great works of art were born not in studios, but in shade. Not in boardrooms or cafes, but on quiet walks, notebooks tucked in pockets, paint drying slowly beside bark. Because a tree doesn’t rush you. It says, take your time. It says, let the world wait.

And maybe that’s why trees continue to inspire. In their patience, their quiet resilience, their graceful aging, they remind us of something too easily forgotten – that wonder doesn’t shout. It whispers.

It doesn’t chase attention. It stands in place.

And it dreams.

. . 

Did You Know?

FAQs About Talking Trees

Why are trees so popular in poetry and art?
 Trees offer powerful metaphors for time, memory, resilience, and growth. Their natural forms – from their roots to their canopy – reflect both the chaos and order of human experience. They also provide calm spaces for reflection, making them ideal muses.

Can sitting under a tree really boost creativity?
 Yes. Studies have shown that spending time in natural settings, especially under trees, reduces stress, improves focus, and stimulates imagination. Many artists and writers describe feeling more inspired in outdoor environments.

What’s a good kind of tree to write under?
 Any tree that provides comfort and shade works well. Oaks are sturdy and spacious. Maples have wide canopies. Flowering trees like jacarandas or cherries add extra beauty and inspiration during their bloom.

Have questions about the trees in your own yard?

Tip Top Arborists is here to help you care for your living legends. Let our certified arborists provide expert guidance for a lifetime of healthy trees.

Contact Us Today